So how do we answer these questions? Let’s start by taking a look at the word Green and its meaning.
The term “Green” started out with a very simple meaning: “natural.” But the intervening years have been anything but natural. Green has become a noun, a verb and an adjective. “The Greenie Greened his life by building a Green house.”
Why did we need the word Green? Why did we need to identify something as other than natural in the first place? The word became necessary when things started to become “unnatural” by default. When we started to create, use, and discard more unnatural things than natural ones, natural became the minority. In our human need to classify, we classified the natural minority with the word Green.
We did this in an attempt to make “natural” the majority once again. We thought, “We’ll call it green and everyone will see its benefit. Everyone will want to create, use, and discard the (natural) green things.” But the word never went away. It went from being a noble cause to a word used to identify a movement. It became a word to identify and classify a group of people. It became a word to label unnatural products in an attempt to fool the greenies into buying it.
Let’s take away the word Green for a

moment. Let’s erase its noun, verb, and adjective meanings. In fact, let’s take away the words Organic and Sustainable, too. What are we left with?
There is no more Green Architecture or even LEEDS Certification. There are no more
Green jobs. There are no more Organic tomatoes or eggs. There is no more Sustainable hardwood flooring. No one goes Green anymore or Greens their lifestyles. Green is dead.
What’s left? Things that are good for the environment and things that are bad for the environment. Utilizing this new bench mark, wouldn’t it make sense to label things “Bad” instead of “Good?” Wouldn’t it make more sense to label things as “unnatural” than “natural?”
Wouldn’t this help shift our focus from buying something that will help the environment, to buying something that is bad for the environment? Given a choice, how many people would choose to buy something that is bad for the environment? Wouldn’t this help us realize just how important our environment is?
Perhaps we should label those destroyers of our biosphere as Reds (the opposite of Green). The guy with the new SUV is going Red. Perhaps we should call any non-renewable energy “Dirty.” Perhaps we should have signs in our grocery stores that say “Tomatoes” and “Chemically Treated Tomatoes.”
How about warning labels? We put warning labels on things that are bad for individuals, (like cigarettes) but not on things that are bad
Go, Live, Be Green
Issue 2 | October 2009